[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes: > Is it the expected behavior for dejagnu to always report warnings > as errors in the "test for excess errors" check? Is this a design > decision or just how dejagnu currently works? I ask because the > current output of "test for excess errors" when a FAIL occurs can > be inaccurate. With -m64 on Darwin we currently get a significant number > of false positives in the fortran testsuite due to linker warnings being > mistaken for errors. Thanks in advance for any clarifications.
Yes, it's a design decision. You wouldn't want cc1plus: segmentation fault to be ignored, even if the compiler apparently successfully built the testcase.
