On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:45:55PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:30:26PM +0100, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > > 3) The above question may not have a sensible answer. It may be either > > because decimal float "is a GCC extensions and thus not relevant to > > traditional C compatibility", as it says in the gcc manual page about > > Wtraditional and nested functions. Or because the behaviour is > > undefined or not documented. Whatever the reason, why we have code > > (and a testcase!) to deal with this? Could I just remove them ? I am > > preparing a patch to add support for decimal float in Wcoercion and > > currently it removes that code and the testcase. > > As for testcase you showed that passes a float to a function with a > prototype, it makes sense to me that it gets a warning for > -Wtraditional.
I always feel so silly responding to my own messages. It makes sense to have warnings about calls where default argument promotions would have made a difference, but not for the calls in gcc.dg/dfp/Wconversion-2.c. Janis
