Hi,

I have a problem with 4.1 on m68k-linux, which miscompiles the following 
test case during the gcse pass:

struct b {
        unsigned a : 1;
        unsigned b : 1;
        unsigned c : 1;
        unsigned d : 1;
};

unsigned int x = 1;

void f(int y, struct b *p)
{       
        switch (y) {
        case 1: 
                p->a = 0;
                p->b = 0;
                break;
        case 3: 
                p->a = 0;
                p->b = 1;
                break;
        default:
                return;
        }
        p->c = x;
        p->d = 1;
}

The assignment to p->c is done via zero_extract:

(insn 46 45 48 5 (set (zero_extract:SI (mem/s/j:QI (reg/v/f:SI 31 [ p ]) [0 S1 
A8])
            (const_int 1 [0x1])
            (const_int 2 [0x2]))
        (reg:SI 40 [ x ])) 278 {*m68k.md:4815} (nil)
    (nil))

The other assignments are done with (and) and (ior). When propagating the 
mem expression, gcse misses this assignment and the assignment to p->d 
overwrites it, because the earlier mem expression was propagated past it 
in a register.

Currently I'm testing the patch below, which simply invalidates the 
load/store. Now I need some help from someone, who is more familiar with 
this code, whether this is the correct approach.
It would be nice if above could be changed into (zero_extract:SI (reg)), 
but I guess that would be a little too complex.

bye, Roman

Index: gcc/gcse.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gcse.c  (revision 116085)
+++ gcc/gcse.c  (working copy)
@@ -5319,6 +5319,16 @@
                      else
                        ptr->invalid = 1;
                    }
+                 else if (GET_CODE (dest) == ZERO_EXTRACT)
+                   {
+                     dest = XEXP (dest, 0);
+                     if (MEM_P (dest) && simple_mem (dest))
+                       {
+                         ptr = ldst_entry (dest);
+                         ptr->invalid = 1;
+                       }
+
+                   }
                }
              else
                invalidate_any_buried_refs (PATTERN (insn));

Reply via email to