Hi, I have a problem with 4.1 on m68k-linux, which miscompiles the following test case during the gcse pass:
struct b { unsigned a : 1; unsigned b : 1; unsigned c : 1; unsigned d : 1; }; unsigned int x = 1; void f(int y, struct b *p) { switch (y) { case 1: p->a = 0; p->b = 0; break; case 3: p->a = 0; p->b = 1; break; default: return; } p->c = x; p->d = 1; } The assignment to p->c is done via zero_extract: (insn 46 45 48 5 (set (zero_extract:SI (mem/s/j:QI (reg/v/f:SI 31 [ p ]) [0 S1 A8]) (const_int 1 [0x1]) (const_int 2 [0x2])) (reg:SI 40 [ x ])) 278 {*m68k.md:4815} (nil) (nil)) The other assignments are done with (and) and (ior). When propagating the mem expression, gcse misses this assignment and the assignment to p->d overwrites it, because the earlier mem expression was propagated past it in a register. Currently I'm testing the patch below, which simply invalidates the load/store. Now I need some help from someone, who is more familiar with this code, whether this is the correct approach. It would be nice if above could be changed into (zero_extract:SI (reg)), but I guess that would be a little too complex. bye, Roman Index: gcc/gcse.c =================================================================== --- gcc/gcse.c (revision 116085) +++ gcc/gcse.c (working copy) @@ -5319,6 +5319,16 @@ else ptr->invalid = 1; } + else if (GET_CODE (dest) == ZERO_EXTRACT) + { + dest = XEXP (dest, 0); + if (MEM_P (dest) && simple_mem (dest)) + { + ptr = ldst_entry (dest); + ptr->invalid = 1; + } + + } } else invalidate_any_buried_refs (PATTERN (insn));