Geoff, I tried the modulo.c and division.c test cases with tonight's gcc svn pull and the problem shows some variability. Sometimes building with 'gcc-4 -m64 division.c' or 'gcc-4 -m64 modulo.c' creates a binary that can resolve the symbol and sometimes not. So the symbol resolution process seems to have some instability. Jack
- ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Geoff Keating
- ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- RE: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin David Edelsohn
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darw... Geoffrey Keating
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Geoffrey Keating
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin David Edelsohn
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Geoffrey Keating
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth
- Re: ___divti3 and ___umodti3 missing on Darwin Jack Howarth