On 21 Jul 2006 10:06:34 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also don't see why revision 108713 would affect this.
> 
> But I do note that this version is still bad.  The rdhwr instruction
> is in the branch delay slot, and is therefore always executed.

Yes, and I think rdhwr should not be in delay slot anyway.  Just
avoiding delay slot is quite easy.  Here is a proposal patch.

With this patch, it seems gcc 4.2 generate desired code for now,
though there might be somewhere to fix.

Index: gcc/config/mips/mips.md
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/mips/mips.md     (revision 115370)
+++ gcc/config/mips/mips.md     (working copy)
@@ -5450,6 +5450,9 @@
 ; MIPS 32r2 specification, but we use it on any architecture because
 ; we expect it to be emulated.  Use .set to force the assembler to
 ; accept it.
+; Since rdhwr always generate a trap for now, it should not be be put
+; on delay slot.  It it was on delay slot, the emulation will be
+; slower.
 
 (define_insn "tls_get_tp_<mode>"
   [(set (match_operand:P 0 "register_operand" "=v")
@@ -5458,6 +5461,7 @@
   "HAVE_AS_TLS && !TARGET_MIPS16"
   ".set\tpush\;.set\tmips32r2\t\;rdhwr\t%0,$29\;.set\tpop"
   [(set_attr "type" "unknown")
+   (set_attr "can_delay" "no")
    (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
 
 ; The MIPS Paired-Single Floating Point and MIPS-3D Instructions.

Reply via email to