Hello, > Diego Novillo wrote: > > sean yang wrote on 07/17/06 22:16: > > > >> Can someone give a brief introduction? Hopefully my question is clear:) > >> > > When you insert a brand new GIMPLE statement, the symbols referenced in > > it must be rewritten into SSA form. See the section 'Preserving the SSA > > form' in the GCC internals manual. > > > > Also, IIRC, tree-ssa-lim ends up rewriting those statements into SSA > later on.
yes, in move_computations. But note that this is not the recommended way -- in fact, it is in my TODO list of things to fix (looong way down, after many more important problems). In your case, you just need to ensure that the arguments of the call_expr are ssa names (or constants). Zdenek
