Roberto COSTA wrote: > Andrew Pinski wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Roberto COSTA wrote: >> >>> Is it a bug... or am I trying to do something wrong? >> >> Why are you trying to regimplify something which is in gimple? > > I'm trying to generate new code, which happens to contain TARGET_MEM_REF. > To do that, I find more convenient to generate a big and deep tree and > to gimplify it later (I saw other passes follow this approach).
Passes that absolutely need to do it, should, others probably shouldn't. It generally is a waste of time and memory to do it if your pass can simply generate piecewise GIMPLE expressions on it's own. Anyway, ignoring Andrew's tangent for a moment, this is a bug. :)
