Paolo Bonzini wrote on 07/13/06 11:55:
> But if you say this is dangerous, yes, I agree that the best thing to do > is to treat VECTOR_TYPEs like COMPLEX_TYPEs and use > DECL_COMPLEX_GIMPLE_REG_P. Does COMPOSITE_TYPE_P, and > DECL_COMPOSITE_GIMPLE_REG_P sound good as names? > Yes, I think that should be fine. Some care should be taken here as we sometimes ask for TREE_CODE == COMPLEX_TYPE directly.
