Re: why are we not using const?

[Manuel López-Ibáñez]

On 27/06/06, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

OK, now you're getting the idea, you need to think about the
difference between

   const union tree_node *
   union tree_node *const
   const union tree_node *const

My fault then, I was erroneously assuming that if "tree" is equal to
"union tree_node*" then "const tree" is equal to "const union
tree_node*". I learnt something new today! Thanks to everyone that
answered.

Cheers,

Manuel.