Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Benjamin Redelings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
substitution.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of
`_ZN5boost7numeric5ublas21scalar_divides_assignIT_T0_E8computedE'
I can't make sense of that as a mangled name. It has template
parameter references but no template definition. That suggests that
it is purely abstract. But we shouldn't have a symbol for an abstract
object.
So this looks like a bug to me.
Ian
Thanks! This is now PR28016
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
-BenRI
