"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 10/06/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > Here is my vote, have four options: | > -Wconversion the same as now. | | This is bad idea. Currently many people are relying in undocumented | behaviour or the false perception that Wconversion detects risky | conversions. If we keep Wconversion, they will keep using it wrongly. | (I don't think most people will read Changelogs).
I don't believe we can just rename an existing option to another one just like that. First, I need to see a clear definition of "coercion", "conversion" and a clear statement why -Wconversion should disappear because of your project. [...] | My new proposal: (c) make Wconversion obsolete. I suggest you leave it, give a clear definition of "coercion". We will decide later whether it should be obselete or not. I'm unwilling to kill it or put it in a dust before seeing anything concrete about -Wcoercion. -- Gaby
