> > After the LTO proposal (http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/lto/lto.pdf) was > posted, a fruitful discussion ensued. One of the key topics that arose > was the the possibility of using LLVM instead of the TREE-SSA > optimizers. Things have quieted down on the public lists since then, > but the need for link-time optimization hasn't gone away -- so it's time > to get moving! > > We've now created branches/lto in the GCC repository to start doing LTO > work, beginning with:
Can you also update svn.html? Also most likely this should be added to update_version_svn so the DATE on the branch gets updated. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
