Roger Sayle wrote: > Hi Mark and Richard, > > On Fri, 19 May 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Roger, would you please revert your MIPS MIN_UNITS_PER_WORD change >> for MIPS on the GCC 4.1 branch? >> >> (My brain failed to digest the fact that the patch was on 4.1 as well as >> on mainline, perhaps in part because there doesn't seem to be a PR; >> Richard indicated to me that he would locate or open one now.) > > Please can you explicitly confirm that we want to reintroduce PR > target/22209 as a regression from gcc 4.1.0, and break the build > of libgfortran on all 64-bit MIPS platforms, including IRIX?
Thank you for raising this issue. The other choice may be to delay 4.1.1 until we have sufficient confidence in Richard's patch. Am I correct PR 22209 is "only" a Fortran problem? This is not a rhetorical question; I'm trying to gather data -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
