Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By removing the AM_PROG_INSTALL definition from aclocal.m4 I was able to > run autoconf 2.59 on the src tree intl subdir with no problems but I was > wondering if we should take the time to synchronize the GCC intl > directory with the src tree intl directory. The GCC version is already > configured with autoconf 2.59. > > I did some testing by copying my GCC intl directory (plus config.rpath) > into my src tree and I was able to build binutils and gas with no > problem and with no other changes needed. This was on a system where > libintl was not installed and the intl subdir was built. > > What do people who build in a combined tree do with intl? Do they use > the GCC version or the src tree version? Is there any consensus about > whether or not there should be a single version of intl, and if so, > which one should be used?
Yes, there should be a single version of intl. I don't think anybody cares which version is used, as long as it works. If you have taken the time to test a unified intl, and are prepared to fix any problems, I think your patch would be great. Ian
