"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, 10 May 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote: | | > Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > > Speaking of typeof, should typeof (vla) follow the same rules as for | > > sizeof (vla)? vla, evaluate, otherwise, no eval. | > | > How would typeof be able to eval anything? | | If you have "typeof ((int (*)[f()])g())", clearly you need to evaluate the | call f() in order to know the type being referred to. As such, I think | the logical conclusion is to evaluate the argument of typeof whenever of | VM type (and so evaluate the call g() as well). | | With VLAs, type names (in declarations, sizeof, typeof, casts and compound | literals) can need to be executed for their side-effects.
well, people may just switch to DML :-) C used to be simple. -- Gaby
