* Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-29 14:54]: > > GCC 4.1 itself appears to be very stable, both on MIPS and AMD64. > > Thank you for doing this, and for reporting the results, and for filing > the bugs!
I've done the same with a snapshot of GCC 4.2 now on AMD64 (x86_64), and I'm currently building on powerpc, sparc, i386 and mipsel. So far I have found the following regressions (some of the following PRs turned out to be duplicates): - ICE in tree check: expected tree_list http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27094 - Segfault with inlining producing negative shift count http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27088 - ICE in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27085 - ICE in tree check: expected ssa_name, have symbol_memory_tag in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:466 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27103 - Incorrect integer division (wrong sign) http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27116 - Segfault with -O2 on x86_64 when compiling hdf5_1.6.5-2 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27144 - ICE in check_reg_live, at haifa-sched.c:4665 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26725 - ICE: verify_ssa failed http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27093 - ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed http://bugs.debian.org/361602 fixed in the meantime: - x86_x64 PIC problems and hidden vs anonymous namespaces http://bugs.debian.org/361445 - gcc segfaults compiling pari_2.1.7-2 http://bugs.debian.org/361715 - ICE in merge_alias_info, at tree-ssa-copy.c http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27087 -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
