On 3/31/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 30, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Camm Maguire wrote: > > This was the most promising. If I could run gcc as a pipe with > > assembler only output, all I need is a 'flush instruction on stdin > > to get the assemly of the function(s) input thus far. > > I suspect we could add a fflush after each function... I don't think > we presently do.
This won't work gcc needs to see the whole compilation unit. Richard.
