"Steven Bosscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does the code conform to the GNU/GCC coding conventions? You can find > those on the gcc web site (http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html).
Hi, thanks for the URL. Generally yes - although the documentation needs more work to include internal front end details (gm2 as of gcc-3.3.6 graft needed no tree extensions). The later graft will define its own tree.def to implement SET_TYPE as previously advised etc. All gm2 command line switches are documented in gm2/gm2.texinfo. It would be good to restructure some of the gm2-gcc interface code, into similar filenames to that used by other front ends. Ie m2typeck.c, m2decl.c rather than the large single file gm2/gccgm2.c. There is quiet a bit of pseudo duplication between gm2 and say the C front end - it would be really good to reduce this if possible.. Regressions tests and ChangeLog entries have been coordinated for some time now. Although they could adopt a more formal PR numbering scheme as per gcc. regards, Gaius
