On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:42 -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:30 -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > On T > > I seem to have narrowed it down to this patch: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00908.html > > > > That's quite a while ago :). >
It was, I am suprised no one took note of it befor enow. I was suprised I had to go back that far to find it. > > i will note the patch is pretty much required for correctness. We were > getting seriously wrong answers before in some cases. > yeah, well wrong pessimistic, or wrong incorrect code. If its the latter, there must be a better way to do it. hopefully its just some check ordering issue thats easily resolved. Its seems like an insane amount of time. Andrew
