Please Cc: me on replies. * Joseph S. Myers wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 02:10:51AM CET: > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > So when we finally do move to a newer libtool we will move to the > > unreleased libtool main line? I guess I was assuming we would move to a > > Yes, unless we decide to audit local changes (since libtool 2.0 branched)
Forget about CVS branch-2-0. The next stable non-1.5.x Libtool release will come from what currently is CVS HEAD. (1.5 will see at least one more release because of a few regressions in 1.5.22.) > for those not on libtool 2.0 branch and use 2.0 branch with some > backported patches. I don't think using 1.5 branch will be a plausible > option. I don't know what upstream libtool policy is on what patches can > go on 2.0 branch. branch-2-0 as in CVS is dead and will not see any further changes, nor will it ever see a release. Cheers, Ralf
