On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 12:36 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Presumably there's a reason why enumeral types don't have a > > base type? > > They are viewed as full-blown types by Ada, forming the class of discrete > types with integral types, so there are probably no semantics reasons why > ENUMERAL_TYPE nodes should have an INTEGER_TYPE node as their base type. OK
> I'm testing a pure fold-const.c patch based on Richard's suggestion. Cool. I was waiting to hear from y'all on the basetype question before hacking up fold-const.c. Looks like you're going to beat me to the punch. I'll be anxiously awaiting your patch :-) jeff
