On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 13:25 -0500, Richard Kenner wrote: > The base type reference is that I'm *also* saying "If you see an arithmetic > node where TREE_TYPE is *not* a base type, there's a bug someplace that > has to be fixed". (Well, with the exception of such things as sizetypes > or subtypes that don't actually change anything.) Ok. That's actually good to know and something worth investigating. Thanks, Jeff
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Richard Guenther
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Richard Kenner
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Sebastian Pop
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Sebastian Pop
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Sebastian Pop
- Re: Ada subtypes and base types Jeffrey A Law