On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 15:55 -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 06:48:40PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > Errr, I emailed you privately a few months ago saying i had set up http > > access :) > > I recall that you mailed me saying that you were *going* to do it, not that > it had been done. However, since I don't appear to have that email, > I'll just say "thank you" rather than argue, when it's probably my > confusion anyway. Thanks. > > > just replace svn:// with http:// > > > > (note if it becomes too much of a burden on the server, we will probably > > have to limit or turn it off). > > I don't get why the http mode should be more costly for read-only access; > perhaps it isn't well-tuned?
Because it can't issue multiple operations over the same channel, and because mod_dav_svn has, um, issues. It's noticeably slower right now than svn:// access, both client and server side. >
