> I'm trying to get:
>
> void foo() {
> int rowfraclo[2];
> rowfraclo[1] = 42;
> asm ("movd mm6, %a0" : : "p" (rowfraclo+1));
> }
>
> With the below patch (still running the testsuite) I can get the
> compiler to generate that code. So, the question is how better can I
> do this?
I don't know how better you can do but this actually fixes PR 23200.
Which does:
static char var;
int main()
{
asm volatile ("" :: "i"(&var + 1));
return 0;
}
(which looks weird in the sense it is undefined code but still legal code).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
