> Passing nothing is equivalent to telling the compiler "I want my > program to run on all versions since 10.1", which means you can't use > EH at all.
OK, but passing nothing used to just work until 4.0 and works on any other platform. That's what I personally find the most disturbing. > I would rather you defaulted to -shared-libgcc, to avoid creating > programs that don't run on future versions of Mac OS. Do you really > care about being able to create programs that run on 10.2? I'm not sure we'd be willing to trade minimal dependencies for "future binary compatibility", but I see your point. I'll let Arnaud decide. Thanks again. -- Eric Botcazou
