Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Yeah, I think I'm going to step back from trying to argue what is and > is not valid. To cut to the chase, I think the best approach for this > particular problem is to wholly avoid having union types share the > same stack slot.
RTH agrees with you. Upon reading the thread carefully, so do I. Would anyone care to prepare such a patch? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
