Richard Henderson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:39:21PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: > >>FWIW, I don't believe this is a "fix", but rather a solid work-around >>for the problem. I'm still trusting rth's superior compiler brain and >>GCC knowledge to ultimately be ingredients in a real fix ;-) > > > I don't think it's quite solid for a workaround.
Would you elaborate? I found myself reasonably convinced by Steven's explanation. I guess a secondary question is: is the workaround sufficiently useful in many of the problematic cases and sufficiently non-harmful in other cases as to merit inclusion, given that we don't have a better solution? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
