Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 10:53 +0530, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

  Mainline fails to bootstrap for me (revision 110017)
on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Configured as:

$GCC_SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=$HOME/gcc --enable-languages=c,c++,java \
- --with-as=/home/ranmath/gnu/bin/as --with-gnu-as \
- --with-ld=/home/ranmath/gnu/bin/ld --with-gnu-ld \
- --with-arch=pentium4 --with-tune=pentium4 \
- --disable-nls --disable-checking --disable-libmudflap \
- --disable-debug --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit \
- --disable-static



Kenny thought it would be nice, rather than pass the actual bb info to free to 
the freeing function, to instead pass some random bitmap.


The attached fixes *that*, but this just causes a crash deeper in trying to 
free some chains.

However, it looks like that is either caused by a double free, or because
 we never null out pointers to things after we free the memory for what they 
are pointing to.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Index: df-core.c
===================================================================
--- df-core.c   (revision 110017)
+++ df-core.c   (working copy)
@@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ are write-only operations. static struct df *ddf = NULL;
 struct df *shared_df = NULL;
+static void * df_get_bb_info (struct dataflow *, unsigned int);
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Functions to create, destroy and manipulate an instance of df.
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -370,7 +371,7 @@ df_set_blocks (struct df *df, bitmap blo
                  EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (diff, 0, bb_index, bi)
                    {
                      basic_block bb = BASIC_BLOCK (bb_index);
-                     (*dflow->problem->free_bb_fun) (dflow, bb, diff);
+                     (*dflow->problem->free_bb_fun) (dflow, bb, df_get_bb_info 
(dflow, bb_index));
                    }
                }
            }
This is why c sucks. In any language with a reasonable type system, this could have been written with a subtype and would not require using a void * arg.

Sorry for the problems and thanks for looking into them.

kenny

Reply via email to