Joe Buck wrote: > So the answer is that, after consulting with some of the affected people > (which is why you got mail, Mike) the SC told RMS that it would be > changed. If it hasn't been done yet, then it's a release blocker, > because it was a promise the SC made.
Since you seem to have a handle on the outcome of the discussion, would you please create a Bugzilla entry for this, targeted at 4.1, explaining what it is the SC agreed to do? Otherwise, I'm certain to forget about this issue... Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
