Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > >> On Monday 09 January 2006 14:42, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> >>> the only passes which do run are cfg creation, expand, and maybe a >>> couple other simple ones. >>> >> I know that. It's expand the one bothering me. Are we issuing errors >> that >> late in the pipeline? > > yes but we should not be but that is a different story and just because > this was how GCC worked since 1987.
Diego, I think you should feel free to fix this. As you say, it's just a recipe for trouble to be doing any code generation at all when errors have ocurred. At worst, we miss some diagnostics -- which we will then issue when the user recompiles after fixing whatever errors they had in the original code. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
