[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But... it used to be the case that the compiler didn't try to warn about
> uninitialized variables embedded in structs (or so I seem to remember...)
> So I was wondering if this was some kind of regression...
I would consider that to be a bug, not a feature. Just because an object is
in a struct doesn't mean its initialisation status is the same as that of the
other objects in the struct, that's a false inference, and there's a whole
category of bugs that revolve around partially initialising a struct but
forgetting one (or more) of the members, so I'd suggest that this was never a
partiuclarly desirable way for the warning to work anyway.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
