On Dec 17, 2005, at 10:27 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Dec 18, 2005, at 1:13 AM, Geoff Keating wrote:
Yes; to do this right, GCC's builtins need to know about the
different names.
If you're interested in fixing this, I can tell you what to do...
I figured out how to fix it and will be posting a patch later this
week.
but a function like:
Yes, looks about right to me, the only modification would be testing
128 bit long double flag (TARGET_LONG_DOUBLE_128) and be aware, this
is a ppc only thang.
And then go through all the builtins which need to be fixed.
If there are functions which aren't built in that are also modified,
I'm not sure what we should do with them. Thoughts? If nothing, how
do we know that they aren't used now and how do we be sure they won't
be used in the future?
