Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, 23 Nov 2005, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | On Tuesday 22 November 2005 18:42, David Edelsohn wrote: | > | > I will work with the GCC SC and FSF on that issue once the licensing | > | > issue is addressed and we know LLVM is a viable option. | > | > | > | What purpose would that serve? I'm not concerned about the SC, initially. | > | It's the development community at large that needs convincing first. | > | > help me finish converting GCC to something compilable with a C++ compiler. | > Without having something concrete to test with, we'll go again over | > abstract arguments -- I did the conversion (many times) on my machine | > as a proof-of-concept. | > | > Lots of things kept (and are keeping) me busy. But, I'm back now and | > working on it. I'd not mind more hands/help. | | Why is this important?
For what? LLVM? I never said it was. | I'm finding that compiling GCC with a C | compiler and using extern "C" around the headers works just fine. some of us needs more than just 'extern "C"' around the headers. And also notice that, not a long time ago you could not just pretend an 'extern "C"' around the headers and compiler it. For more information, search the archive. -- Gaby
