It looks kike that patch contains a typo

The entry for nonmemory_operand has an extra bogus false

The following patch more than likely fixes the fallout I've just kicked of
a x86_64 bootstrap to find out

Index: gensupport.c
===================================================================
--- gensupport.c        (revision 107251)
+++ gensupport.c        (working copy)
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@
   {"const_double_operand", false, {CONST_INT, CONST_DOUBLE}},
   {"nonimmediate_operand", false, {SUBREG, REG, MEM}},
   {"nonmemory_operand", false, {CONST_INT, CONST_DOUBLE, CONST, SYMBOL_REF,
-                        false, LABEL_REF, SUBREG, REG}},
+                               LABEL_REF, SUBREG, REG}},
   {"push_operand", false, {MEM}},
   {"pop_operand", false, {MEM}},
   {"memory_operand", false, {SUBREG, MEM}},


Cheers
Graham

Reply via email to