On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > I meant exactly this, gcc supports -fno-stack-protector (although gcc > defaults to no-ssp), so -fno-stack-protector-all should be there too
Why? What option would it perform? r~
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > I meant exactly this, gcc supports -fno-stack-protector (although gcc > defaults to no-ssp), so -fno-stack-protector-all should be there too
Why? What option would it perform? r~