On 11/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I appreciate that this is quite valid according to the ANSI C > standard and the team are within their rights to change this, > but I am curious to know the reasoning behind the change which > seems to me to make the object code less optimal.
This is more like pure luck that it worked in the first place. And maybe bad luck for you now. But this "change" is surely just a side-effect of a different change, maybe even just a change in the amount of good/bad luck you're experiencing. Richard.
