On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote: > 2) when we see :0 align to the next unit, which seems to be the > behavior of GCC pre-3.4.
If by "unit" you mean "size of type for the :0 field" for targets with PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS==1, and "byte" for non-PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS targets, fine with me. Actually, only the latter is of interest to me at present. :-) (Else that'd imply a change of the ABI for CRIS which is "packed by default" so :0 causes padding to the next byte.) brgds, H-P
