Mark Mitchell wrote: > Josh Conner wrote: > > >>I think this is consistent with my proposal -- the first example was >>non-conforming, but accepted without -pedantic (as we do with other >>zero-sized arrays). The second example was conforming and the only way >>to alter its behavior was with the -fpermissive option. > > > My point was that conforming programs should compile and behave > identically in all modes; therefore -fpermissive must not alter the > behavior.
OK, thanks for the clarification. I'll prepare a revised patch and submit it for approval. - Josh
