[ Bringing this back to fortran@, taking the optimizer guys out of CC: ] Quoting Toon Moene: > I still have to construct a bug report of something that confuses the parser > and that basically looks like this: > > IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8 (Y) > CHARACTER*11 Y1, Y2, Y3 > ... > YA = 'D' // Y1 // Y2(1:3) // Y3(1:3) // > 1 // YB(1:5) > 1 > Unclassifiable statement at (1) > > Unfortunately, if I reduce the code to this one (continued) line and the > necessary declarations, it doesn't fail ;-)
Does this fail as long as you keep the type implicit? This reminds me of another PR, where the parser would decide too early that it had seen an array range instead of a substring, which would lead to these kinds of niceties further down the line. Unfortunately, I couldn't find this bug in bugzilla, looks like its PR's summary is not very descriptive. - Tobi
