On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > I should probably note again that i don't plan to convert wwwdocs to svn > > right now, because the checkout scripts are a bit hard to follow, etc. > > Per se there doesn't seem to be as much of an advantage for wwwdocs > as we had for gcc (no branches, most changes only to one or two files, > no need for binary regression search, no tagging,...) so it's not > urgent. > > In the mid term, it'll probably be simpler to have both gcc and wwwdocs > under one version control system. I'll certainly help where I can; for > the more intricate scripts, Jason Molenda probably is the best person > to ask for help.
It should also be a lot easier to get the commit hooks to do what we want with SVN. As is, the auto-checkout sends its own messages to gcc-cvs-wwwdocs because of an unknown problem with using log_accum there; with SVN we could and should generate messages just like those which go to gcc-cvs. -- Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CodeSourcery mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
