On Oct 25, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
But this is not an extension at all. This is an implementation
defined
behavior which is different than what an extension would do.
People depending on this is not the correct thing do any ways as
there could be another compiler besides which GCC which does this.
<nod> I'm not disagreeing with anything you're saying. My only
point is that it might be in gcc's best interest to have the same
implementation defined behavior as MS, EDG-based compilers and
CodeWarrior when that is a reasonable choice (and probably others, I
know my list of compilers is incomplete).
-Howard
