So, collecting together the response to last night's mail:
Status of PR 19292 metabug:-
5900 The penultimate entry says -
I would like to propose that this bug be closed. This is about as
good as it
gets. We should set up some automatic regression testing on LAPACK
from hence
forth.
Let's close it then - how about it, one of you Lapack afficianados?
13939 Concerns ugly commas - do we want this? If so, it can be done.
14067 The final comment is "The ICE is fixed, but this could still do
with a warning."
14994 SECNDS missing - I would say that this should be done. I have
used an interface to get round this one.
I will do this.
15234 libgfortran doesn't compile on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F - ??? 5.0 is no
problem with a gcc-3.x
16465 parser chokes with ffixed-line-length-7 - is this essential?
16580 hmmmmm, gfortran ICE on test g77.f-torture/execute/intrinsic77.f
is this a show stopper?
17737 ICE when variable appears in two data statements - invalid code.
I'll put this on my TODO list.
18026 boz initialization of REALs fails. Penultimate comment "
I've removed the "reject-valid" keyward because the code is not valid
Fortran 95. From section 5.2.10, we have:"
18737 ICE on invalid use of external keyword - this should be fixed.
It is on my personal TODO list, I'll move it to the top of the pile.
19425 Duplicate SAVE attribute problem - illegal f95 and questionable f77
Patch submitted (pinskia reply)
20441 -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran - a useful legacy
requirement IMHO.
20811 gfortran include problem (regression from g77) - this should be
fixed. A good tyro project.
21565 namelist in block data is illegal - I had better deal with this,
hadn't I?
On the TODO list.
22175 BYTE Type Statement - Last comment "We do have a patch adding
that enhancement."
Asher Langton has done it. (FX reply)
22244 dimension information is lost for multi-dimension array -
primarily gdb and optimization problem.
22282 loc intrinsic and %loc construction is not implemented in
gfortran - do-able but not a disaster.
Part of the Cray patch (FX reply) that Steve will commit next week-ish.
22290 Optimize Assigned GOTO to cause error with -O1 or higher - we
seem to have a fix for this(?)
Patch here: (FW reply)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-10/msg00194.html
But has not been reviewed. I will look at it next week but might need
help/advice.
22359 fseek intrinsic appears to be unimplemented - should be done
(using C fseek?).
FX intends to do - timescale? + putc, getc and so on.
23060 %VAL construct not implemented - do we want this? If so, it is
do-able.
23912 MOD function requires same kind arguments - very fixable.
I would say that this is a 33:33:33 mix of
fixed:do-able:ignorable/wrong - let's have a blitz on it.
On the basis of the replies, the proportions are more like 50:25:25. If
somebody wants to do my TODOs, feel welcome. Are you back FengWang?
You are the one saddled with legacy code and must, I suppose, have an
interest in some of these?
Paul
