Hi Joel, On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 08:28:29AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2025, 7:41 AM Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > > That said, I'd like to move away from gcc-testresults as a vetting > > > tool to something more modern. > > > > If the port has a (qemu) emulator we could create a x86_64 container > > for it and run it once a month/week on one of the faster > > builder.sourceware.org workers. > > > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/README > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/containers > > > > Are there any ports that can be tested that way? And does someone have > > a description (or script) of such a (cross) build that we could turn > > into a x86_64 container build? > > For which architectures? We might have one if RTEMS ever ran on it.
I think for architectures where there are at least some people who would fix issues pointed out by the builders and/or where the release maintainers want to know if the port is not broken, showing it at least builds. Cheers, Mark
