Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > CVS write access users should give the subversion setup a try this week. > > Is there a branch that represents the tip of the old-gcc repository? It > appears that premerge-fsf-branch is intented to be this, but it is missing > many files from old-gcc repository.
Yes, premerge-fsf-branch is supposed to be a branch holding all revisions of files changed at the FSF sources after the merge from the FSF sources into the EGCS sources. Now I see that I failed to add the branch tag to files in old-gcc which were not modified after the merge. I updated the cvs sources on gccmerge-branch, and regenerated /pool/ian/repo. I tested a checkout of premerge-fsf-branch, and the only differences I saw were due to RCS keyword expansion. Hopefully Danny can incorporate this change into the final subversion conversion. Thanks for noticing. Ian
