Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Oct 13, 2005, at 8:58 AM, Joe Buck wrote: | > -Weffc++ is broken and should just die. | | Or we can `modernize it' by removing those things we no longer agree | with, and document the bits of it that we don't like anymore in the | manual.
I find that to be invitation to confusion. People who the rules or have been trained to learn the rules would be needlessly confused. And people who don't know them would be confused too. Call it something else you shall. -- Gaby
