Hi Carlos, Thanks for starting this discussion.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:17:37PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell via Gcc wrote: > These changes clarify what was meant by "real name" and that it is > not required to be a "legal name" or any other stronger requirement > than a known identity that could be contacted to discuss the > contribution (and what was attested). > > The same changes have been made to other projects including as noted > by Sam James in the Gentoo project [2], Mark Wielaard in elfutils [3], > and CNCF [4]. It should probably be noted that gentoo, elfutils and CNCF (community usage) didn't simply change the wording, but also included a clarification of what the wording change meant to the policy. > I've submitted a patch for the gcc text. For those trying to following the ongoing discusion about this proposal through inbox.sourceware.org might have noticed it didn't appear in the archives. That has been fixed [*] and the whole thread has been (re)imported: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/c5db2ad6-6410-4add-a6ff-74b4eabf4...@redhat.com/T Cheers, Mark [*] The issue was that the original proposal was sent to @sourceware.org instead of @gcc.gnu.org which public-inbox rejected. The config has been updated to accept emails to either address.
