Re: RFC: redundant stores in C++

[Dale Johannesen]

On Oct 1, 2005, at 7:29 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

I don't think this will work for the following code:

void foo(char a, char b) {
  char x[4] = { a, b } ;
  if (x[3] != 0)
   abort ();
}

Duh.  I thought that was too easy.

But better fix would be not call split_nonconstant_init_1 for
local decls and have the front-end produce a CONSTRUCTOR which is
just like what the C front-end produces.

I'll try it.
\