On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:35:22 +0200
Gabriel Ravier via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> [pages of bullshit deleted]
>
> 2. Are you aware that these emails are not only pretty useless, but 
> potentially actively counterproductive ? I'd personally expect GCC 
> developers, who are rightfully not particularly happy at the thought of 
> having to constantly suffer your belittling emails, to at best actively 
> ignore them - but even worse from what I presume would be your POV (that 
> of someone who wants GCC's optimizer to improve), this constant spam 
> might give rise to what would be a pretty reasonable response: to be 
> biased against any proposed improvement that comes from or derives from 
> your emails. 

Sounds like the response of an idiot, or a malignant individual who isn't 
interested in improving their junk code. A not-uncommon response in today's 
world, full of arrogant, self-righteous, brittle individuals who just can't 
stand criticism.

> PS: I hope you understand that I'm being somewhat generous when assuming 
> you genuinely want to get GCC's optimizer to improve,

What? Are you claiming he *doesn't* want to see it improved?

> Someone else might  instead think you're just a troll 

Not you, of course. No sir. You're smarter than that, right?

> that uses this as a pretext to send 
> inflammatory emails everywhere and waste the time of people like me.

I thought the entire purpose of these threads was to call attention to the fact 
that our time IS being wasted already, by the shitty GCC optimizer?

Dave

Reply via email to