On Tue, 9 May 2023 16:14:28 +0100 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> This isn't "be like Clang", this is "diagnose things that have been > invalid C since 1999". And in the process, break half of my system, and make it even more of a pain in the ass to compile old software. With no real gain or benefit whatsoever. To hell with that bullshit. > Accepting invalid code by default is a disservice to users. Those who > need to compile invalid C code can use an extra option to allow it, > the default should be to tell users their code is doing something bad. The default ALREADY IS to tell users their code is doing something bad. It's called a "warning." Hello? -- Dave Blanchard <d...@killthe.net>
