On 9/28/05, Christian Joensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/27/05, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now that Benjamin and Eric have fixed the Solaris issues in libstdc++ > > (yay!), I know of no reason not to spin a release. I'm going to take a > > final pass through the open PRs and look for show-stoppers. Is anyone > > aware of regressions from previous 4.0.x releases that are wrong-code, > > ice-on-valid, or rejects-valid? That will be the class of bugs that > > would concern me most. > > > > I plan to create the release later today. I don't plan to do an RC4, > > unless people think that's absolutely necessary. However, I would > > encourage people to do a quick run-through from CVS to make sure that > > libstdc++, in particular, is working for them. > > Well, for sparc/sparc64 running linux, I get ok results. See > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01275.html > > Here are the details: > > LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 27 17:29:41 UTC 2005 >
> === libjava tests === > > > Running target unix/-m64 > > Executing on host: /usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/xgcc > -B/usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/ > /usr/local/src/branch/gcc/libjava/testsuite/libjava.jni/invocation/PR16923.c > -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/src/branch/gcc/libjava/testsuite/../include > -L../.libs -lgcj -lm -m64 -o PR16923 (timeout = 1200) > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible ../.libs/libgcj.so when searching for -lgcj > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible ../.libs/libgcj.a when searching for -lgcj > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcj > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > compiler exited with status 1 > output is: > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible ../.libs/libgcj.so when searching for -lgcj > /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible ../.libs/libgcj.a when searching for -lgcj > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcj > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > FAIL: PR16923.c compilation This one is addressed here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q3/msg00351.html -- Cheers, /ChJ
